Green Grilling Debate: Charcoal vs. Gas
May 1, 2008
There has already been lively discourse over the flavor attributes of charcoal vs. gas grills. Now, debates have been emerging around the country about whether is is greener to grill over charcoal barbeques or on gas grills. Which patio toy produces fewer carbon dioxide emissions in the long run?
In an article published in the The New York Times green issue, Tris West, an environmental scientist at Oak Ridge National Laboratories, calculated emissions from the two methods. He concluded that since charcoal is derived from wood products— trees that absorb atmospheric carbon as they grew — burning it on the grill approaches a “net zero” resulat in terms of carbon emissions. By comparison, gas grills use propane which is a fossil fuel that adds to greenhouse gas accumulations. However, West cautions that the polemics become a tad more complicated because burning charcoal may release particulates into the atmosphere.
The good news is that your choice won’t effect any significant change in mass carbon emissions. By West’s estimation, the total amount of carbon dioxide released from barbecue grills on July 4 is on the order of .003 percent of the annual U.S. total. Has the issue returned to flavor now?
I couldnt live without my Weber gas gril.
http://www.bobbysbest.com/Weber-Grills-Review.html
I don’t think we should feel guilty about using either gas or charcoal. Consider this: If we aren’t cooking outside, then we’re probably cooking inside and creating heat at the same time that we may have our air-conditioning cranked up. Does that make sense? If the marginal use of electricity is coal-generated (most likely), then that’s a double-whammy to CO2 emissions. Cooking on an electric stove will generate excess heat and make air-conditioning (if you have it) work harder.
There are many ways to help reduce CO2 emissions, but has anything thought of “move less, breathe less”, not having children, or jumping off a bridge?